Talk:Macaulay Culkin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Macaulay Culkin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 10 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Bad grammar in main description

Making his return in the film blady blah, blah. Should be filmS with an 'S' and then an 'and' between the films. u get me?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.239.54 (talk • contribs) 09:37, December 31, 2017 (UTC)

Use of full name

Hey guys, I personally feel like we should be using Culkin’s full name in the introduction to his article. Considering how that’s pretty standard for other biographical articles I don’t understand why we don’t do it here. (eye)rizz (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

His full name has been included for years without conflict before becoming truncated today. I was surprised to enter the talk page and not see discussion around that decision. Considering the long precedent and the general acceptance around including his full name, I think the onus falls on @Soetermans and @Daniel Dungca to weigh in as they are the ones choosing to shorten it without explanation. Harrisonisdead (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted back to his full name just now with this explanation, without realizing a concern had been raised by the other person who had done a revert. (I think it's potentially likely that Soetermans' revert (a rollback) was done because without the context that it's his real name, it looks like vandalism. Using rollback in any other situation here would be a misuse of rollback.) - Purplewowies (talk) 20:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly what happened! What a silly celebrity thing to do. Sorry (eye)rizz for the error. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]