Talk:Sierra Club

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sierra Club article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 12 months

Climbing Mid‑importance

	Climbing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Backpacking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 28, 2004, May 28, 2005, and May 28, 2007.

Criticism

Why is there no criticism section? The Sierra Club is routinely criticized by lots of people, including many who use public lands for recreation.Marshaul (talk) 06:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, why is all of the actual history of Corporate subversion of the Sierra Club not even mentioned? The Sierra Club today is nothing like what it used to be, now it's a right wing Corporate front, its leaders are Republican shills and they have some rather extensive finanical questions that they should answer to one-time members for, none of which is covered here. NotSoOldHippy (talk) 02:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not confuse The Sierra Club with The Sierra Club Trust. The one with the small annual budget is relatively transparent and has relatively high ratings with charity evaluation sites. The one with the enormous funding is relatively opaque. The Trust successfully avoids the poor- or non-ratings.

There is certainly internal and external criticism along the lines you mention (for the most part, at least -- I don't think I've heard "Republican shills" about an organization that endorses mostly Democrats). The problem is finding coverage of that criticism. I could add some information based on my personal knowledge but that wouldn't meet the verifiability standard. JamesMLane t c 10:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although criticism sections are not banned on Wikipedia, many editors consider them problematic. Here's a quote from an essay found at WP: criticism sections:

"Separating all the controversial aspects of a topic into a single section results in a very tortured form of writing, especially a back-and-forth dialogue between 'proponents' and 'opponents'. It also creates a hierarchy of fact — the main passage is 'true' and 'undisputed', whereas the rest are 'controversial' and therefore more likely to be false, an implication that may often be inappropriate. Since many of the topics in an encyclopedia will inevitably encounter controversy, editors should attempt to write in a manner that folds debates into the narrative rather than 'distilling' them out into separate sections that ignore each other."

Funny how any wiki entry that falls in line with the liberal/progressive agenda doesn't need a "criticism" section, but anything outside the agenda should. The bias here is evident. --Hamsterjoeb (talk) 14:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As for the substance of NotSoOldHippy's allegations about the Sierra Club, I think that Republican influence in the Club in the early decades was far more prevalent than of late. William Kent who helped create Muir Woods was a Republican, for example. I recently wrote a bio of Norman Livermore, a Republican who was active in the club from the 30s to the 60s, who played a very constructive role on balance, in my opinion. If NotSoOldHippy can come up with some reliable sources that back his/her point, and write up the material from the neutral point of view, then I wouldn't object. Disclosure - I am a Democrat and a Sierra Club member since 1976. Cullen328 (talk) 00:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is the sierra club foundation another way that they can divert the public from unwanted attention to financial activity? 73.12.149.250 (talk) 00:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These comments should be included in the Sierra Club Foundation talk. 73.12.149.250 (talk) 00:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a huge disservice to students not to mention that Sierra Club essentially made global warming worse by getting NRC to destroy any hope of getting away from coal on a reasonable timeframe.205.185.116.30 (talk) 06:38, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The previous version singled out one among many Sierra Club policies (restore Hetch Hetchy) and mentioned one of the reasons to oppose that policy (San Francisco need for drinking water). My reaction as a first-time visitor was that it violated NPOV. I expanded the discussion of the policy to show that SC isn't indifferent to SF drinking water. Reference to dams "in California" deleted because SC has opposed dams across the country. I also added a sentence re SC governance. JamesMLane 21:34, 13 Jan 2004 (UTC)

History

Should the article mention the Sierra Club's loss of its tax exempt status for engaging in political activity in 1966? --Blackeagle 17:34, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Certainly. The article should have more history material. Cheers, -Willmcw 03:57, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

iPhone 17 Slim Concept Based On Leaks Shows Everything We Should Be Looking Forward To, Including The Part-Aluminum, Part-Glass Design

Apple is allegedly chipping away at a super dainty iPhone, as most would consider to be normal to see sunshine one year from now with the send off of the iPhone 17 setup. The iPhone 17 Air will highlight a revived plan, an extreme improvement over the ongoing variations. The organization seems to have assumed a lower priority with regards to making changes to the plan lately, as it has been continually adhering to minor changes. Another idea has arisen, which shows the plan of the iPhone 17 Air in light of late breaks and reports.

iPhone 17 Air idea shows what clients ought to be anticipating not long from now Posted by Technizo Idea on YouTube, the iPhone 17 Air idea video shows a total overhaul of the gadget, as it will supplant the 'In addition to' display in the setup. The gadget is additionally expected to be the slimmest iPhone Apple has made, in any event, considering the ten years old iPhone 6, which estimated simply 6.9mm. While the organization battles with the battery substrate, we anticipate that the gadget should highlight thickness beneath the 6.5mm imprint. The iPhone 17 Air idea follows ongoing holes and reports, and that implies on the off chance that the news has any weight to it, we could see a very close rendition of the handset in the not so distant future. As should be visible in the video implanted underneath, the iPhone 17 Air could highlight an evenly organized camera cluster, like the Google Pixel 9 series. While there are clashing reports in regards to the change, we accept it would seem OK for Apple to permit the switch. The idea shows a triple-focal point camera on the back, which is very odd as the organization is accounted for to be adhering to a solitary focal point or a double focal point framework.

Other than the camera framework, we can see that the gadget includes a section aluminum, part-glass configuration, as detailed the year before. The part-glass configuration is to a greater degree a mandatory decision for Apple to hold remote charging capacities, yet it is not yet clear in the event that the organization intends to add more highlights. On the front, the gadget includes a 6.65-inch OLED show with Advancement support. It can likewise be seen that the Unique Island is more modest on the front contrasted with the iPhone 16 setup. The feature of the iPhone 17 Air idea is the super slim plan with a USB-C port on the base. While it is too soon to reach last determinations, the iPhone 17 Air will be the organization's most advertised gadget, interesting to the majority in view of its looks. You can look at the video implanted above for additional subtleties. 2401:BA80:AC14:8E6C:3:1:DC5F:F0DF (talk) 08:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]