This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Parliamentary Procedure, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Parliamentary ProcedureWikipedia:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureTemplate:WikiProject Parliamentary ProcedureParliamentary Procedure
My concern for optoelectronics is that it is an illegal system and it has hurt people all around the world. Its illegal because it is worked by/with electricity, in-frared, fiber affecting, human affecting, tampers with DNA..... ETC, ETC, ETC. People in an illegal gang or department usually are the ones doing the work to harm and depart others from a natural habitat. 107.242.121.5 (talk) 03:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A series of studies coming out of the University of Michigan in the 1950s and 1960s argued that many voters lack a basic understanding of current issues, the liberal–conservative ideological dimension, and the relative ideological dilemma that are important to understand when making political decisions.
I question whether increased ignorance of the largely artificial alignment of the party system would be bad for the health of the polity! But that's a question that likely belongs elsewhere. —Tamfang (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
