Jump to content

Talk:Nigger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

N-word should redirect to the slang term.

Popular consensus is the n-word is typically referring to the slang word rather than the slur. Coronaverification (talk) 07:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are they not literally one in the same? UnbearableIsBad (talk) 22:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If by "slang word" you're referring to the colloquialism "nigga", then you are incorrect: "N-word" refers to the slur, not the colloquialism. Thanks and happy editing.Chillowack (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warring over the case of a letter?

@VexVector: and other interested editors need to talk about it instead of this tug of war. Cheers. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 02:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record: I agree with VexVector; it's not a proper noun and is used in the disputed case (puns rule) within a sentence, so should be all lower case. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 02:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Correct: The word nigger in the opening paragraph should not be capitalized. It is not a proper noun. Vex-Vectoꝛ 02:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another important meaning of the woodpile phrase

The "US slave-era phrase denoting escaped slaves hiding in train-transported woodpiles" ALSO refers to concealed/denied mixed-race ancestry. I don't know how that information should best be included/acknowledged, but it shouldn't be ignored. Poihths (talk) 19:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guidance for Wikipedia editors

I arrived here after finding the full N-word quoted in another article. My personal understanding is that it would be more appropriate to euphemize as "N-word", or replace in a direct quote as "[N-word]" when it appears in article content. To anchor my opinion in the article itself, the section "In an academic setting" illustrates a close analogue to the Wikipedia context, in which 80% of a class on hate speech unenrolled after hearing the lecturer use the word. I'm sure context was relevant in that case, but it's relevant here as well: nobody is paying attention to the article's authors using the word in an intra- or inter-group sense, they simply know that it's disgusting to come across egregious usages. Is there already a discussion thread about recommended writing style (and moving this article to "N-word" with a redirect back to it, for that matter)? Adamw (talk) 14:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, Wikipedia doesn't do euphemisms. Or alter direct quotes. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 20:33, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]