User:Rmhermen
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 61483 |
| Edits+Deleted | 64841 |
| Pages deleted | 3958 |
| Revisions deleted | 14 |
| Pages restored | 30 |
| Pages protected | 80 |
| Pages unprotected | 9 |
| Protections modified | 23 |
| Users blocked | 101 |
| Users reblocked | 1 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- 46.3.241.35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently only vandalising pages Catalyzzt (talk) 15:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Let's see if they stop after a final warning. WaggersTALK 15:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2.28.107.151 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently only vandalising pages - This IP seems to be just vandalizing, and ignoring warnings, and being rude to those who try to help. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! (talk) 16:00, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
83.9.35.43 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) disruptive behavior. Beshogur (talk) 16:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 103.109.59.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) solely falsifying religion figures - continued after final warning - Arjayay (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 143.177.55.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Shakshouka (diff): vandalism after final warning. Persistently replacing sourced content with baseless WP:OR and edit warring. Also, this edit shows that they're not here to build an encyclopedia. M.Bitton (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently.
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Peaceray (talk) 18:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2a02:4540:c060:c5ed:783c:91ff:fec2:12c8 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Sock of banned User:NamayandeBidokht continuing same edits and redirect as discussed on ANI, please consider protecting Bahmanabad-e_Jadid also. Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Requests for page protection.
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Peaceray (talk) 18:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Will do! Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jojopaki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "paki" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Poliowefawetawetawertawtwat (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Daily disruptive edit from IP-hopping editor. MrOllie (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consensus to delete this article, but IP users trying to revert the redirect back into an article. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Disruptive editing with copyright violations. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 138.88.222.231 (talk · contribs) (from Paul Pelosi). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Article has been the subject of concerted attempts by multiple COI accounts to install promotional material in a BLP. Axad12 (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Protection expired yesterday and vandalism by IP addresses returned almost immediately. I think protection should be for few months because I don't think election dispute will end soon, so one week protection was not enough. LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Dealer07 who has been using IPs from Greece. Binksternet (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. The activity extends beyond just that article, so a rangeblock seemed more appropriate. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent ban evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky who has been using IPs from Turkey. Binksternet (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated adding of unsourced airdates by the same IP address, after a different source already confirmed them. 1033Forest (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses and new accounts since 18:35, 18 May 2021. Alith Anar 18:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Added that page to existing partial block of the more disruptive IP address range. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip hopper posting personal attacks in the article. Knitsey (talk) 18:36, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism from User:NamayandeBidokht, has used a sock and now WP:LOUTSOCK under 2a02:4540:c060:c5ed:783c:91ff:fec2:12c8. Also continuing same edits on Bahmanabad-e_Jadid, can this be considered also or do I need to report separately? BTW I've not reported on SPI as it's just one IP (so far), but please let me know if you think this would be helpful. Blue Sonnet (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 6 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 8 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Hi, I am requesting for this rights, because I have about 5 new articles that are yet to be reviewed and surely meets the notability criteria, I have been creating and improving articles especially on African Cinema and with this right, I hope to reduce the backlog on the new page reviewers log. Best regards, B.Korlah (talk) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
To support WP:JAN25 I'd ideally like to be contributing to reducing the backlog as opposed to contributing to increasing the backlog at the same time. Overall in the last 25+ BLP articles I've created, there have been few to no edits made by NPR, aside from typos, grammar, and duplicate words. The first handful lacked certain templates, categories, default sorting, talk page banners, and the usual technical parts of articles, but I've since got to grips with including these. Since then I've only moved my drafts to mainspace, or created in mainspace, when I'm confident that there is enough SIGCOV and structure, and otherwise "incubate" articles not quite ready in draft space if not. I otherwise create quite a few redirects, with one disambiguated, and one batch up for discussion, but otherwise none deleted so far. Thanks for considering. CNC (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
An experienced editor with around 600 pages created, with few deleted; I've reviewed pages that they have created as part of NPP and they reach the standard expected without intervention. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Has created more than 200 articles, with none having been deleted. As part of NPP, I reviewed a recent creation, and found it to be complete without the need for editing. Reviewing other pages, they look to be similarly appropriate. Klbrain (talk) 09:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Rename from "Sir MemeGod", which is already on the list. Planning on whittling away at Category:Talk pages with comments before the first section. EF5 20:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC) EF5 20:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I arrived here from WP:POSTMOVE, and it's not my first time needing to clean up wikilinks from a recently moved page. This tool looks like it could save me a reasonable amount of time having to redirect links post move. Thanks in advance. CNC (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Hiya! A year ago I had AWB self-requested to be removed due to inactivity with it. Now, I think it's necessary for me to have this tool again to fix formatting issues and as part of the ongoing NPP drive. Thanks! ~ Tails Wx 02:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have use wikipedia since year 2021 and contribute regularly for the readers in wikipedia. I think it's time to get categorised in confirmed user because the contributions I make in past year. And there won't be any reason to request to denied. Thanks Genius64868 (talk) 18:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 300 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing. Examples of Recent Contributions: Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter, which are in my area of expertise. My recent edits also contributed significantly to upgrading the article History of the Jews in Tunisia from "Start-Class" to "B-Class." Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Not extended confirmed despite meeting criteria Heyaaaaalol (talk) 05:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
The backlog is getting insane and I just want to help. I have well over the needed edit count and time editing. History6042 (talk) 16:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to help out with the January NPP drive, as I've participated in the other recent drives. I believe I meet the criteria for the NPR right after reviewing them. Thanks! — voidxor 21:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help with the backlog. I've created around two-dozen mainspace pages (including disambiguations) and 150 redirects and have participated in AfD discussions. – MW(t•c) 09:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I've been giving feedback on new pages for sometime and would love to participate in the January NPP drive. I'm quite well versed on what the standards are and when I don't I look it up! Would be more than happy to assist. Marleeashton (talk) 09:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to join the NPP backlog drive! Spiralwidget (talk) 11:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request NPR rights to participate in the January backlog drive. I meet the criteria and have previously had NPR on a trial period for the last backlog drive. Thanks. Lordseriouspig 00:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been an AFC reviewer since March 2024 and am currently on probation. I want this flag to clear the backlog drive for next month (January 2025). Kindly read User_talk:Sohom_Datta#NPR_request for my previous decline cause conversation. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 15:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello I'm Ampil. I'm participating January 2025 drive. I have 78 AFC reviews and 19 accepts. My rights set to expire 10 days. Thanks. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 11:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
I want to apply for new page reviewer rights as I want to participate in January NPP backlog drive with the time I have in hand and the contributions I have been making from last few years. Hope it will be accepted.Gardenkur (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC) Gardenkur (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
I’ve been actively contributing and working diligently to improve the quality of pages. With a significant number of edits under my belt and extensive experience gained over time, I believe I am well-qualified to be granted new page patroller permissions. I’m eager to help tackle the growing backlog and ensure that new pages meet the required standards. I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to take on this responsibility permanently. Ensconce (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
So I can participate in the News Page Patrol January backlog drive. I have participated in a New Page Patrol drive before, and wish to help again. :) Mason7512 (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to help out with the NPP backlog drive. I believe I fit all the minimum guidelines; I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and sufficient experience with quality control processes, as I engage with the deletion process, especially PROD and CSD, whenever possible and I help out WikiProjects by writing new articles. I try my best to communicate in a civil manner with editors in communication. In the scenario I get approved for this, I strive to review pages and reduce the backlog strictly on a volunteer basis, to contribute greatly to Wikipedia by reviewing pages with this duty. MimirIsSmart (talk) 09:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There is a massive backlog which I would love to help out in! Yeshivish613 (talk) 18:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I was previously a reviewer, hopeful to return now after illness. I'd like to get back into it, and already into the working again in AFC/vandalism. thanks! Snowycats (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I would very much like to remain a New Page Patroller, please, and to have the three-month period extended indefinitely. I greatly enjoy this aspect of being a Wikipedia editor, and believe that I have made a very positive contribution. In the three months since my NPP rights were last discussed, I have marked as reviewed several hundred pages, some of which I had to edit quite a bit to get them into appropriate shape and others which were created so well that they were really good without me having to do much or anything. I have of course reflected a lot on how best to go about this important task, and to minimize my errors and weak judgements. I am far more cautious than before, and consequently I have actually marked as reviewed far fewer pages per week than I did before. Indeed, when patrolling new pages, I often edit pages for hours each day without marking any at all as reviewed. I am demanding a higher standard in my own mind than hitherto. This does not mean that I have not made mistakes over the last few months. I am human and have made errors. I do not believe there have been many, however, and I consider my efforts to be reliable and trustworthy, but I am disappointed in myself for making any mistakes at all. The key here is that I try hard always to learn from them and not to repeat them. I am neither proud nor disputatious, and I try to treat all fellow editors with respect and pleasantness if they highlight any issue, and I do try to absorb and begin using any and all guidance that I receive. I respectfully ask my fellow editors to see that any errors over the last three months have been very few, and that by percentage of the pages I have edited or marked as reviewed, the errors are a tiny percent, thus establishing me as dependable and trustworthy. I have gratefully received several barnstars for my patrolling throughout this period. I repeat that I regret getting anything wrong at all and aim for zero errors. I am committed to this standard. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Managing the NPP backlog is something I've been doing for some time in terms of monitoring video game pages as part of WP:VG. I've been pretty extensively involved in managing drafts, particularly flagging and identifying drafts that do not meet WP:GNG or other reasons, and taking WP:DRAFTIFY, WP:PROD or WP:AFD actions for recently created articles that do not meet WP:GNG. I think the track record with WP:AFD is pretty solid even if it leans to deletionism a little. I've just realised I could be doing something more constructive and marking reviewed pages as well. Believe there was a one-month trial run I did in 2024. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I’d like to request temporary NPP rights to participate in the January NPP drive. I have two years of editing experience and meet the criteria. Thank you! Gauravs 51 (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I fit the basic criteria and I think I could make a contribution here. I have a fairly good idea of my limitations and will deal with them by passing on the more difficult new page decisions. I may trouble more experienced editors for guidance from time to time while I get up to speed but I'll be as self contained as possible. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit] |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I believe this could help me out with the current vandalism fighting I do that may involve pages with pending changes. I have read WP:RCP, and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's P&Gs. Mon Bhai converse∫edits Mon Bhai (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Requesting Pending Changes reviewer permission - I am active editor for quite some time now and recently saw an alert for January New Page patrol backlog drive. I want to contribute to that, but thought I can start with Pending change reviewer first. I have a good understanding of wiki policies, and am continuing to familiarize myself with them. I have also read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Criteria_to_receive_this_permission and understand expectations for both gaining the rights and performing the pending changes. Asteramellus (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
I patrol recent changes on occasion and have split part of Mikhail Gorbachev into General secretaryship of Mikhail Gorbachev. I have reverted countless non-constructive edits and I think I have enough experience to be a pending changes reviewer. I have also reviewed the GAN of Kiruko and Mizo Chieftainship. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 12:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I've been editing wikipedia semi-actively when real life allows for almost 3 years and recently surpassed 1000 edits. I have fully read and understood everything linked at WP:PCCRITERIA. The main reason I think I am suited to having pending changes reviewer rights is because of my current project to clean up the backlog at CAT:ESP, CAT:EEP and in the future CAT:COIREQ. The work between those and proposed changed reviewing is very similar and would allow me to help there as well. Ultraodan (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I was granted right for 60 days now I would like to renew it. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Have been a part of Wikipedia for a while now, usually contributing with proofreading, rewriting for clarity, updating data, removing inaccurate data, etc. With most of my contributions being of an editing nature (rather than creating something new), I think that being able to approve pending edits from others would allow me to contribute more. ArtistPrime (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
I previously asked for rollback rights back in November but was turned down with the reason given was I need more experience first. I'm here two months later to once again ask for rollback rights as it would make what I do a lot easier. Although I don't edit Wikipedia purely to revert vandalism, I come across my fair share of it or unsourced claims and stuff to that degree that need reverting. So I am once again asking for rollback rights as I took the previous advice on board. Lemonademan22 (talk) 6:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
Can I work on the
|
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
 |
WP:AIV |  |
WP:ANI |  |
WP:NPP |  |
WP:RPP |  |
WP:RFR |  |
WP:AFD |  |
WP:XFD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
CAT:CSD |  |
WP:CSD |  |
WP:RM |  |
WP:RAA |  |
WP:DR |  |
WP:TM |  |
WP:TT | ||||||
 |
WP:RCU |  |
WP:LOP |  |
CAT:AB |  |
WP:BS |  |
WP:RD |  |
WP:NFC |  |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [8] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]
Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system
