This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Munition redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cold War

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

=Untitled

cryptography and its history as well as software protection and such stuf uses the word Munition for the fortification of software and such. There is no need to redirect to Am-munition witch is the destruction of such fortification. 85.220.89.25 (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is cryptography in U.S. still regarded as munition? --195.210.230.161 11:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]